to review "KenFM on Wikileaks"
In this blog we would certainly not mainstream, that is, we can also differentiated views on.
I'm with the contribution of KenFM not agree, only partially.
The claim that this is the Wikileaks a democracy, one can not as it stood. Wikileaks is a medium that serves only to inject the true information into the Internet network, Wikileaks have to do with democracy to really do anything, the media can serve democracy and fight just as well it depends on the application. Until now, there is no suspicion that the information would be synthesized at Wikileaks. But there is no certainty that this is not the case.
One has to take but it's true that over the selection of documents that become public are the mass media have decided to set the tone, or someone will claim the opposite?
Suppose that "Wikileaks is the truth to power", the selection is subjective, in the case of private, weighting the news, and therefore no truth but rather a selective presentation of facts / documents. Where is the difference when determining the private and the state Media Council, which publications of Wikileaks are pushed in the media?
"why it is perfectly OK if the federal government a data thief 2.5 million" paid for "stolen" data of tax evaders?
has claimed the first post that the data (at Wikileaks) simply can not be stolen, now they are "stolen", then the claim that the purchase of the CD "totally OK" is wrong, it's not OK, but the federal government has more crimes of this kind, are EU Constitution / Treaty, "rescue package", "rescue", various "reforms": pensions, health care, not least Hartz laws, 1 € job, etc. All this is not legally compliant, but be right and justice are getting two different things. "Are completely independent reporting it now only on the Internet"
2:50 Min
Regardless of who? The claim does not help us further how can you tell whether a report on the web independent or dependent? The only thing we have available, our understanding and observation of the source, an "independent" source may turn out to be fast as dependent if they are more accurately takes a close look, for example other Wiki: the Wikipedia , understand the Wikipedia itself as a replica of the mainstream media.
from certain size, even the function of a news source is absolutely necessary if the source is to the credit (ie financial dependence) depend.
min 3:20 only when a citizen reads what Wikileaks published begins to doubt his representatives ...."
What? Who of you began to doubt the people's representatives to Wikileaks, the majority's enough in the doings of the representatives of the people below, which finally lives ASR. No, we are not really that stupid to need to read the Wikileaks in order to understand what is happening. Wikileaks has only confirmed what was discussed at ASR long ago and that detail.
5:10 min: "we all" support the Wikileaks.
As written above, I am aware, but I do not support, why should I do? Because she was pushed in the media just as strong?
min 7:00 "The Internet was invented by the U.S. military ..."
This is not quite correct, the ARPANET project was in fact financed by the Pentagon, but it was about the connection of the computer mainly in the research centers and universities. Primarily, the Internet was used for the exchange of information between the universities. The use of military and commercial purposes was possible 10-15 years later when the technology was mature.
Wikileaks "this non-profit orgnisation"
Who had ever insight into the accounting / finance of the organization other than the private PayPal service?
"What did the 11 th September and the Wikileaks common? ... Both have the snowball effect ... he is unumkehbar."
And if that is not the only similarity is, what then? Wikileaks is still no information provided about 911, it would be the time to do that, or are they for Wikileaks taboo?
We read frequently in ASR, the marketing method is generating a need first, then our loyal suppliers come with the final offer that meets this need perfectly and we consume. Wikileaks fit perfectly into this pattern, they provide us with a confirmation of what we need in the truth, which is beautifully done and we are all grateful for this is not that great?
6th December 2010 19:51 (only an excerpt from this post)
0 comments:
Post a Comment